Map every component
Website, checkout, scripts, iframe or redirect, gateway, processor, devices, networks, accounts, plugins, integrations, logs, and support access.
Payment security responsibility
Choose the payment architecture, then document the merchant, provider, platform, and validation responsibilities.
PCI DSS scope cannot be determined by a website plan or trust seal. It depends on how cardholder data and payment pages are handled across the complete merchant environment.
Start with the payment flow
CMS Max supports configurable payment workflows, but the merchant must understand where payment-page elements originate, which systems store, process, or transmit account data, which people and devices can affect the environment, and who requires validation evidence.
Website, checkout, scripts, iframe or redirect, gateway, processor, devices, networks, accounts, plugins, integrations, logs, and support access.
Confirm provider services, PCI status, shared responsibilities, integration method, evidence, incident terms, and change notifications.
Confirm the applicable SAQ, Report on Compliance, scans, testing, attestations, deadlines, and submission path with the responsible entity.
Shared responsibility model
The exact division varies by merchant and provider agreement. Use this model for discovery, then replace it with the documented architecture and current compliance evidence.
Payment methods, accounts, staff, access, policies, devices, networks, vendors, ecommerce content, changes, incidents, evidence, and required submissions.
Hosted or embedded payment elements, tokenization, authorization, settlement, fraud services, provider evidence, incidents, and contractual responsibilities.
Configured checkout or form integration, website controls, credentials handling, changes, support access, testing, documentation, and platform responsibilities in the agreement.
Merchant level, applicable SAQ or report, scans, evidence, attestations, deadlines, exceptions, compensating controls, and submission acceptance.
CMS Max payment architecture
The current application contains provider-specific integrations and settings. Features, methods, credentials, tokenization, refunds, test modes, fraud controls, checkout compatibility, and compliance impact must be confirmed for the selected path.
Important: This diagram is an operating overview, not a PCI scope determination. The exact browser, server, provider, account-data, device, network, and support paths require review.
SAQ eligibility is conditional
PCI SSC states that SAQ A eligibility depends on all payment-page elements originating from PCI DSS compliant service providers and every other eligibility criterion being met. Merchants should confirm the correct validation path before assessment.
Operate the control environment
Document payment channels, providers, accounts, domains, pages, scripts, systems, devices, networks, users, vendors, and data flows.
Confirm the standard, merchant level, SAQ or report, scans, testing, evidence, attestation, deadlines, and receiving entity.
Manage access, credentials, changes, vulnerabilities, scripts, logging, incidents, providers, backups, and staff responsibilities.
Reassess scope after checkout, gateway, plugin, domain, script, device, vendor, staff, network, or integration changes.
PCI compliance FAQ
This page is educational and is not a compliance certification, legal advice, or a substitute for the merchant's acquirer, payment brand, processor, or qualified assessor.
Yes. PCI SSC states that PCI DSS is intended for entities involved in payment processing, including merchants regardless of size or transaction volume. Validation and reporting requirements are determined by payment brands and the acquiring relationship.
No. Compliance depends on the complete merchant environment, payment architecture, providers, website controls, people, policies, devices, integrations, access, evidence, and applicable validation requirements.
PCI SSC currently publishes PCI DSS v4.0.1 materials and aligned Self-Assessment Questionnaires. Merchants should confirm the current standard, required validation method, deadlines, and instructions with their acquirer, payment brand, processor, or qualified assessor.
CMS Max cannot determine that from a plan name. SAQ eligibility depends on the precise payment-page architecture and every eligibility criterion. Confirm the required validation path with the entity receiving the submission or a qualified assessor.
It can affect scope, but only when the implementation satisfies all applicable criteria. PCI SSC explains that SAQ A eligibility requires all payment-page elements to originate from compliant service providers and all other eligibility requirements to be met.
The current CMS Max payment architecture includes configurable support for Stripe, Authorize.Net, CardPointe, and Paya or ACH workflows. Availability, checkout support, credentials, methods, refunds, fraud controls, and compliance scope vary by provider and implementation.
Monitor payment-page changes, access, scripts, providers, domains, certificates, vulnerabilities, incidents, logs, devices, integrations, staff changes, evidence, annual validation, and provider attestations as applicable.
Start with the payment architecture
CMS Max can help document the platform and implementation path while the merchant confirms the applicable compliance obligations and evidence.
The world's fastest and most SEO friendly website code.